On Consumerism and Religion
B"H
Excerpted from correspondence with my dear friend R' David Ingber:
What angle are you interested in? Jewish or secular or both? Are you interested in approaching this from a Halachic or Meta-halachik perspective?
Well, I'll tell you how I arrived at the topic, which may help. I have been taking time here and there to ripen up my "Slow Judaism" thesis, which evolved from a case for small-town Jewish community into a kind of general anti-movement manifesto. So my interest at entry is in the Jewish meta-Halakhic angle...
But I've found the ramifications of consumerism in Jewish religious life very difficult to write about with precision or consistency, because I don't have the language to describe religious consumerism in general (so I find myself haphazardly making it up as I go). What I'm asking, I suppose, is whether such a language has already been developed adequately by another contemporary writer.
One text that immediately jumps to mind is Nachmanides famous interpretation of the verse, "Be holy, for I, G-d, am holy." We are not allowed to be "Naval B'rshut Hatorah", which loosely means that Torah sanctioned decadence is prohibited and spiritually unhealthy.
Though I could see it becoming a blunt instrument, ... the first apikorsus that leaps to mind is whether the consumption (so to speak) in a particular mitzvah or class of mitzvot, to the extent that it blocks other dimensions of engagement with haShem and His Works, could be considered decadence in this sense [of naval b'rshut haTorah]. Anyway, it seems the basic notion is, for the mortal to aspire to depth in his experience, he must maintain the capacity for balance. And it is a mitzvah for the Jew to aspire to depth, therefore excess of any kind, which necessarily sabotages individual balance, is asur...
Meanwhile, my meta-halakhic angle goes something like this: All Judaism today is Modern ..., in the sense that it is produced and marketed and consumed on an industrial scale. This means all religious Jews, whether Orthodox or Renewal or Reform [or full-on, unadorned Humanistic], and all religious Jewish communities, share a common spiritual challenge, which is to identify and smash (transform, reattribute, ...) the idols of Consumerism. So, from a standpoint either of spiritual counseling or of religious community-building (and I honestly don't know which of these is my personal calling, but I suspect it's at least one of them), "movement" -- [i.e.] brand -- affiliation is irrelevant to the basic need for a way to make deep sense of our relationship with consumer choice, because consumer choice is the principal slavemaster of our age, affecting all Jews and communities more or less equally.
In order to do my real avodah in this life, I need tools for understanding the capacities of consumer choice to limit self-realization. I know that it has these capacities. I can see it all around me in this beautiful, deafening city. (And why else would the movement orthodoxies be so powerful if it weren't for a massive tide of Jews growing overwhelmed and stifled by too much choice?) But I need a way to get at it. I need a language, so I can build myself a good sandbox, and play.
Comments (2):
Links to this post:
Create a Link
*slides slowly to a stop in front of a clue*
Are you saying that you think the "brand loyalty" exhibited in contemporary Judaism(s) is a product of a consumerist way of living nowadays (with its modernist attachments)? Because I can see that (I think I saw it before too, but less clearly). But are you then also saying that "smashing the idols of consumerism" is viable? I mean, possible? Is it a thing you can see?
I guess that's what you're asking too, in the last bit. And so here's my thought then: is there a way to do it, besides through practice? Besides living the unbranded reality - in which one is still, from afar, exhibiting brand loyalty and being perceived as brand loyal - is there a way to articulate it so that it actually creates porous borders between labels? Without becoming a movement on its own?
*takes her rain cloud and moves on* - sorry... :}
By kyla, at 2:12 PM
Are you saying that you think the "brand loyalty" exhibited in contemporary Judaism(s) is a product of a consumerist way of living nowadays (with its modernist attachments)?
Yes. Brand loyalty isn't just a little trap set by Madison Avenue for the stupid and the gullible. It is a direct, logical response to the challenges of unprecedented anonymity and responsibility for decision-making that attach to individuals as a matter of course in industrialized society.
But are you then also saying that "smashing the idols of consumerism" is viable? I mean, possible? Is it a thing you can see?
Every idol has a way it can be smashed. Otherwise it wouldn't be an idol. :)
I think you and I saw some idols of religious consumerism smashed via daily interfaith encounters in the Kosher-Halal Co-op, for example.
Is there a way to do it, ... besides living the unbranded reality - in which one is still, from afar, exhibiting brand loyalty and being perceived as brand loyal - is there a way to articulate it so that it actually creates porous borders between labels? Without becoming a movement on its own?
Well, where it becomes a movement (brand) of its own, it has failed. (See: Reconstructionist and Renewal movements.) I think we can derive most of what we need to know about the mechanics of iconoclasm from Avraham Avinu and Sarah Imanu. The praxis of their iconoclasm seems to have consisted mainly in: (1) walking away from idolatrous practice and building a new home for themselves, and then (2) leaving the door wide open to all visitors. Now, you can apply that model in many different ways, and I doubt they're all equally helpful. My suggestion is for us to: (1) refocus on home-building (as opposed to synagogue/mosque/nation/institution/brand-building) with an aim to situate the functions of Home in an environment where it is practically possible to get away from brand-worship (see upcoming post), and (2) nurture social habits of openness, so that the Truth of our experience and that of those we encounter is witnessed and realized. This way, the homes we build, and the relationships we accept upon them, become the pores between the labels.
Look, Ma, I'm a pore!
sorry... :}
Why? :)
By Yoel Natan, at 5:47 PM